Now enrolling at Chelsea World School · 2026–27 · Seats limited per bandEnquire now →
Code Camp by SCCCode Camp by SCCNow at Chelsea
AI PathwayAt ChelseaHow We TeachStudent WorkFor Schools
Enrol →
← The whole climb
Classes 8-9 · Year one • Ama Dablam BasecampProduct & systems

Turn algorithms, data and models into a working product.

Text programming is now normal. Students receive a well-defined problem and broad architecture, then own the implementation: structured programs, data structures, algorithms, real datasets, API data, simple learned models, testing and debugging.

“I can build purposeful computational products.”

Who owns whatThe problem and broad architecture are supplied; the learner owns substantial implementation, data work, algorithmic behavior, model integration and testing.

  1. Classes 4–5 · Year oneMera Basecamp
  2. Classes 4–5 · Year twoMera Peak
  3. Classes 6–7 · Year oneLobuche Basecamp
  4. Classes 6–7 · Year twoLobuche Summit
  5. Classes 8–9 · Year oneAma Dablam Basecamp
  6. Classes 8–9 · Year twoAma Dablam Summit
  7. Classes 11–12 · Year onePumori Summit
  8. Classes 11–12 · Year twoCho Oyu Summit

“I can write and reason about structured text programs.”

→

“I can implement and explain a purposeful product that combines algorithms, data and learned models.”

What changes this year

  • Functions and abstraction become serious program-design tools.
  • Lists, maps/dictionaries, sets and nested structures are chosen for what the program needs to do.
  • Linear/binary search and sorting families introduce real algorithm comparison.
  • Efficiency begins through operation counts/runtime growth—not formal proof.
  • Students load, inspect, clean, transform and visualize genuine structured datasets.
  • Model work includes features, labels, train/test reasoning and error analysis.
  • A simple API introduces request/response and external data as a real system dependency.
  • The learner distinguishes software tests from model evaluation.

Supplied architecture. Serious implementation.

Try the thinking

A minute of Ama Dablam Basecamp thinking.

An illustrative interaction, not a lesson from the curriculum — but the reasoning is the reasoning.

Should we write the rule—or learn the pattern?

Interactive example

Two approaches can solve the same task. The mature question is not 'Which one is more AI?' It is 'Which one fits the evidence and the problem?'

The taskRecommend whether a trek route should be marked CAUTION based on wind, rain and visibility.

The eight labelled records

WindRainVis.Label
1209SAFE
2818CAUTION
1884CAUTION
1063CAUTION
1619SAFE
2407CAUTION
1428SAFE
2055CAUTION

The new reading

wind 22 · rain 4 · visibility 5

A human expert labelled this one CAUTION.

What they produce

  • Structured multi-function applications
  • Data-flow/system diagrams
  • Cleaned/transformed datasets
  • Deterministic algorithm explanations
  • Simple trained-model evaluations
  • API-backed features
  • Software tests + model evaluation
  • User-test revisions and limitation statements

What you should be able to see

  • ✓Structured source code
  • ✓A data-flow/system diagram
  • ✓A deliberate data-cleaning decision
  • ✓An algorithm tested independently
  • ✓Model performance on unseen examples
  • ✓A rule-vs-model comparison
  • ✓A module the learner did not originally write but can explain/modify
  • ✓A debugging record and user-test revision

Support matters. A heavily guided success is not reported as independent mastery.

Twelve Projects. One climb.

A Band is not a pile of unrelated activities. Each standard Band contains 12 Projects arranged so that capability is established, combined, transferred and increasingly owned.

  1. P1–P4Establish / Acquire
  2. P5–P8Combine / Extend
  3. P9–P12Transfer / Own
Illustrative synthesis example

A data-driven decision product comparing a deterministic method with a learned model

Students receive the user, problem, data source, broad architecture and bounded model/algorithm choices. They own the implementation and must compare what the deterministic and learned approaches do well or badly.

Design archetype: Build and Evaluate an Intelligent Decision System

Illustrative synthesis archetype from current Band design; not a guaranteed final Project title.

Where Ama Dablam Basecamp lands on each capability

These are Band end-states, not lesson titles. Follow any of them across all eight years in the Capability Telescope.

AAlgorithms & problem solving
Use linear/binary search and sorting families, select useful data representations and begin reasoning experimentally about efficiency.
BProgramming & representation
Read, trace, explain, modify and debug structured programs and supplied modules.
CDebugging
Diagnose wrong data types, dictionary keys, return values, stale state, API responses and train/test mismatches.
DTesting & reliability
Design stronger test plans, separate software correctness from model evaluation and preserve what exact version was tested.
EData & evidence
Load, clean, transform and summarize real structured datasets; use descriptive statistics and critique visualizations.
FAI & machine learning
Train simple supervised models on unseen data, inspect errors and compare deterministic vs learned approaches.
GSystems & architecture
Implement within a supplied structure such as interface → logic → data/model and understand how components exchange information.
HTechnical judgment
Compare deterministic and learned approaches on explainability, data needs and error patterns.
ISecurity, privacy & human-centered computing
Design for a defined user, reason about sensitive data and convenience/privacy trade-offs, and revise from testing.
JExplanation, transfer & technical defense
Produce code/data/model explanations, simple diagrams, test evidence, debugging notes and a short technical presentation.
Open the Capability Telescope→
What becomes possible next

What Ama Dablam Summit adds

Class 9 stops supplying as much of the system shape. The learner increasingly chooses the architecture, data structures, algorithms, model approach and reliability strategy.

Climb to Ama Dablam Summit
← What prepared them: Lobuche SummitSee the whole climb

Program

  • AI Pathway
  • How We Teach
  • Student Work
  • At Chelsea World School
  • For Schools

Company

  • About
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Privacy

Social

  • Samman Creative
  • Facebook

Get Started

© 2025 Samman Creative and Consulting — All rights reserved.

Built and run by SCC

Built with love from Kathmandu.

For DesignersTerms of usePrivacy policy
💬Enquire · WhatsApp